Twitter, Haters, and Tactics: Chicago Fire vs. Chivas USA

nyarko vs chivas 2013 usatoday

Oooh we had some fun Sunday night, didn’t we?

OTF’s Shane Nicholson reflects on last night’s 4-1 Fire loss at Toyota Park

I caught some flack post-match for a tweet I popped off to Chris Rolfe midway through the second half after he’d squandered possession in a fairly dangerous area for the umpteenth time this young season. Maybe it was unfair. After all, it’s not exactly his fault his manager thinks he’s a left-sided midfielder. I’ve seen nothing to suggest that’s the case at all.

I’m just going to get this out of the way early on so people understand: I am not here as a Fire fanboy.

I have a club I love and support; the Fire happen to be my local side from my youth and are again now that I’ve moved back into the area. I am a football fan, I am a Rangers supporter, I live in the vicinity of Chicago so I go to Fire matches. As a contributing writer for On The Fire, the club’s issued me a press credential. So FYI – this report comes from Toyota Park, not my living room.

The tweet in question simply said “be better at your job.” Chris got back to me as I was sitting in a bar in Old Town waiting on a few friends, wondering what his job was and how he could do it better. This opened the floodgates for tweeples who don’t seem to be able to take off their rosy-red colored glasses to see what’s going on.

“Marty Party” chimed in with the insightful, “Hey hater. Go fuck yourself,” followed not too long after by the Fire WUFC account letting me know I’m little more than a “keyboard warrior” and that my “mad skills” were surely no match to Rolfe’s on the pitch. Though to Fire WUFC’s credit, its keyboard warrior skills are so absolutely staunch that by the time I got home to pop this piece out they’d pulled their tweet.

Couple points: 1) I’m no “hater.” I just know bad football when I see it, and this Fire side has been terrible from the first kick this season; 2) My footballing skills don’t really have a bearing on my abilities as a journalist or even as an observer of the sport. Chris probably couldn’t do my job any better than I could do his. Anyone who resorts to that argument to batter down criticism that wasn’t directed at them in the first place is missing the point, apparently so much so that they’re not willing to stand by it upon further review.

Thing is, Chris was a consummate pro, and seemed to take the criticism to heart. He deflected the rabid Fire Twitterati, saying there was no harm in my comments. And when I further clarified my critique – including the fact that I felt his boss had let him down – Chris responded with a most gracious and seemingly self-aware, “I respect that. Thanks I know I can do better” [sic].

Diversion here, as I’m going to pull you back into a five-minute or so passage of this most recent match…

In the second half, Chivas opened their account as Chicago, not for the first time this season, failed to take care of a set piece. Frank Klopas responded a few moments later by replacing Daniel Paladini with Maicon Santos. I failed to grasp this decision, as I felt Paladini had been our best player on the park. That was, until I saw a shift in the side.

Before Santos’s entry, the Fire went from a flat and rather undynamic 4-4-2 with Rolfe and Nyarko deployed on the left and right sides, respectfully, Paladini and Larentowicz trying not to step on each other’s feet in the center, and Alex playing off the shoulder of a rather abject and seemingly disinterested MacDonald. From my seat, there were at this point at least three players out of position, and we were being overrun in the midfield. Chivas were looking to blow the match open.

Enter Santos, exit Paladini, and the shape changed – for a few minutes anyway. Rolfe was pulled more centrally, Larentowicz dropped deeper to break up play, Alex played as the point of this midfield three, and MacDonald, Nyarko and the newly introduced Santos played as a more fluid front line, free to move about and swap positions as they pleased. 

The positive results were immediate, as Chicago equalized after a quick break that found Santos on the wing. Maicon made a tidy run inside, played the ball to MacDonald at the top of the 18-yard box, and Sherjill laid it on to Nyarko for the equalizer. It was 1-1, and the team looked kind of good in attack for the first time this season.

And just as fast as the Men in Red found themselves in that shape, it was quickly shattered. The 4-4-2 that had seen us overrun in midfield during the preceding 30 minutes came back, as Rolfe and Nyarko reassumed their positions out wide, Alex dropped back into a more central role, and Santos and MacDonald failed to find cohesion as a striking pair up top. In the end, the 4-1 result was a bit flattering given how poor Chicago looked after their goal.

Solutions seemed few and far between for manager Frank Klopas on Sunday afternoon. Early on in the match – and on more than one occasion – he flipped Nyarko and Rolfe. I was hoping the coaching staff had highlighted a mismatch they felt could be taken advantage of, but the move quickly appeared to be little more than, “That isn’t working, so why don’t we try this?” There seemed to be no rhyme or reason to it.

Similarly, the insistence on having goalkeeper Paolo Tornaghi play every single ball in the first half deep against a 20 mph wind was perhaps not the most tactically astute decision. Not a single goal kick or free kick taken by Chicago’s ‘keeper made it past the halfway line, and even though it was clear the wind wasn’t going to die down during the entirety of the first 45 minutes, not once did Klopas or his staff see fit to tell a defender or two or three to hang back and collect a short ball or throw out from Tornaghi.

On the other hand, in the second half, Chivas quickly gave up on trying to play the high ball out of the back and instead opted for low-driving drop kicks and quick throws to the wings and full backs, which resulted in numerous breaks going the other way. It was an incredibly simple thing to identify and adjust for, yet Chicago attempted to fight the gods/wind patterns of Bridgeview and play passes that simply were never going to be completed with any high probability.

So maybe the problem isn’t Chris Rolfe. In fact, I know it’s not. When he was deployed in a reasonable manner he played well – as did the rest of the side for about five minutes before it was all blown up again.

When the Fire packed the center of the pitch and pulled its fullbacks in tighter, they stopped being overrun and played some good football. For whatever reason, despite his team’s first goal of the season and decent ball movement during said five minutes, Klopas quickly reverted to a style that has seen his team get absolutely dominated during stretches of the opening four matches. It was around this time that Rolfe gave away possession in what looked a decent chance for Chicago to take the lead, which lead to a quick counter from Chivas, which set up the free kick that gave them their second goal.

So, as it were, Chris got my wrath in that spurt of less than 140 characters, and he owned it after the match. Fair play to the man; most professionals would have the toys out of the pram and pitch a standoff against their fans on social media. But maybe Chris, like me, is looking at a side that’s scored one goal in 360 minutes of football this season and thinking, “This isn’t good enough.” He certainly acted like it in our brief exchange last night.

I would put forward – after a few drinks and some time to reconsider the match – that Chris Rolfe is not the problem, nor did I honestly think he was at the time of tweeting. The man who really needs to get better at his job and in a big damn hurry is his boss, the esteemed Mr. Klopas, who seems unable and unwilling to adjust to what’s being played out before him. And this is not a small sample size we’re dealing with here. This goes back to last season’s dismal free-fall, which was, as we’ve seen, simply setting the stage for the opening act of this campaign.

FACT: Including last season’s playoff loss to Houston, Chicago Fire is in the midst of its worst ten-match run in franchise history (1-7-2 with a goal differential of -12). We have to go back to May 6th – July 4th of 2007 to find a comparably bad ten-match run (1-7-2, GD -10).

So, if you’ll allow my mad hating skills to say as much: Frank Klopas, be better at your job. And do it now before we have to write off this entire 2013 campaign before it’s even really begun.

Contributing writer Shane Nicholson is the founder and Executive Editor of – He drinks a lot, has a beard, and lives in Rockford. You can find him on Twitter at @ofvoid

11 thoughts on “Twitter, Haters, and Tactics: Chicago Fire vs. Chivas USA

  1. “Be better at your job” sounds like something much more in line with being a fan boy (just a negative one) rather than something a credentialed press person would tweet. No? You seem to present a very unprofessional tweet and then back it up by saying your are credentialed.

  2. The problem with Twitter is that is very direct and comments come off glib and sometimes negative, and we all tend to put a spin on the tone of the Tweet. However, ‘be better at your job’ does sound a little negative for someone who is a fan with a press pass. Seems a little knee jerk, especially, after you just analyzed the game a bit more and Klopas’ role in positioning players, etc. I just hope they can start to do better as a team and get a win. We are all fans and disappointed, players included. We should try to lift them up and not tweet what can seem as a negative comment…even though we might all be thinking the same thing. I am starting to think Klopas is the biggest problem.

  3. I don’t see it as a negative or positive issue…you can be professional and insightful on both parts of those spectrums. Just seems if you wanna be treated as credentialed pro you have to tweet like one. And passive aggressive snark that is personal doesn’t seem to fit that bill. Not a huge deal was just reading this and its a compelling issue that came to mind.

    • I appreciate that, and think I cover both ends of the spectrum quite well. Yeah, I’m snarky and kind of a prick sometimes (although having sat through four matches, two in freezing conditions at TP, I think that’s reasonable at this point) but Chris took it better than the fans. Much respect for the man in doing so.

      It’s not personal to tell a professional football player he needs to do his job better. Just because I don’t spend 12 inches of column space making some long worded approach to the same ends doesn’t make my criticism any less valid (much like the fact that I myself am not a footballer should not weight into the equation).

      There is a fundamental shift in how some things are being covered, and you can either sit back and be a Mitch Albom and be content because your name is on a byline and write smarmy bullshit that people 50+ lap up, or you can move with the flow. I try to do the latter in covering football, both here at OTF and for my other stuffs. There’s a reason the stuffy journalism of our dad’s generation is dying a slow painful death.

      Anyway, this could become a rather lengthy discussion in its own right. I gave Chris a more reasoned explanation last night that he seemed to accept; good on him. I hope we can do better than one win from our next 10 matches but things have to change and fast.

  4. “Be better at your job” sounds trite to me. There are a lot worse things one could have offered – especially in the heat of battle. The important point, as I see it, is that one is able to sit down later, collect ones thoughts and present them in an honest, and hopefully entertaining manner. Additionally, if one can learn something or even gain a slightly different perspective on the issue at hand – then the writer has truly been successful.

    I found your thoughts and comments very informative and entertaining.

    Others may disagree or perhaps feel that you owe someone an apology for such a trite comment. I am not of that opinion. If an apology is due it should come from this club for the inferior product it has presented to its paying customers.

    Like you, I agree that at this point one must begin to question if the coach is up to the challenge. He may or may not be the problem but it is the natural response after such a terrible stretch.

    “Be better at your job” should be posted on the locker room door.

  5. I think the direct access to players social media provides has lead to a massive increase in sycophantic behavior by supporters. When that behavior turns on someone justified in their critiques of a side that has underperformed at historic levels, then it is up to those fans with experience that lack the glassy-eyed starstruck mentality to solidly pop the flattery bubble those currying favor have surrounded themselves with by saying, “Hey dummy…. That Emperor you are so quick to protect there? That Emperor has no clothes on.”

    And I applaud them for doing so.

    Shane could’ve justifiably blown up anyone of the men on the pitch last night. I personally thought Wells Thompson played the worst 90′ of defense I’ve seen in the history of Fire matches I’ve observed. On two separate occasions he was playing 10 feet behind the line allowing the Goats as much space. If anyone needs to be better at their job it’s him.

    • And I was actually praising Thompson early in the first half! He quickly became a liability after half time. They targeted him repeatedly on the break.

  6. Putting Twitter drama aside (where it should be, imho), this Chicago team seems like a prime opportunity for a new coach. They have a talented side (last season was not an accident) that seems to be without a plan. New structure and tactics would do this squad well.

  7. I do not think we are better than last year. Our three best players went overseas, and all we did was bring in some Colorado rejects to replace them. We need a complete cleanout of the front office and coaching staff. It’s gonna be a long season. As of now i feel sorry I renewed my season tickets.
    I hope I am wrong, and will continue to support the team, but I doubt I am.

  8. Actually, I think Chris Rolfe could do your job (soccer journalist) at least as well as you can, if not better (probably better), he did graduate university, he’s a decent blogger and he’s also been a pro soccer player for almost 10 years.

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s